More Pages: Morgan Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


Too many Alsatians but good for the beginner
very good short no nonsense book
A book full of striking photos and good advice

Working Moms Don't Bother
LOVE this book!
What Every Mom Needs. . .is this book. . .Two other things that made have made this book a real winner as far as I'm concerned: First of all, Elisa and Carol give very generous credit to their sources, including an appendix with footnotes, and a "for further reading" list at the end of each chapter. What I especially liked about this was that they did not limit their research to Christian authors and sources. Thanks to them, I rediscovered Barbara Sher's book "Wishcraft" and as a result of digging through HER book, have more or less rekindled some dreams of my own. So, I feel as if I owe Elisa and Carol as much a debt of gratitude as I do Barbara. Isn't that cool? And secondly, they emphasize very strongly that all moms need to look out for each other--none of this "mommy war" stuff between women who work outside the home and women who are spending a season at home.
And I do have to agree with the other reviewer about this book making a great shower gift. I heartily recommend that this be given to a new or expectant mom, along with a gift certificate for a free night of babysitting. You'll definitely get that mom's prize for best present!


A developmental model psychospiritualityPeck claims that he arrived at this theory through experience, although he footnotes the fact that there have been many theories on psychological development prior to his, the most recent being a six-stage faith developmental model (see "Stages of Faith" by James W. Fowler)
Although Peck's elucidation of his theory is informal and sketchy, I find his model of psychospiritual development idiosyncratic enough to be regarded as a separate theory by itself.
Peck aptly calls it psychospiritual since it has both psychological and spiritual/religious dimensions. It is much akin to the developmental theories in psychology, yet it has a very strong religious flavor--Stage 1 being the lack of spirituality/ethical behavior, Stage 2 as orthodoxly religious, Stage 3 as a time of religious skepticism or atheism, and Stage 4 the mystical level.
Yet I believe Peck's theory tends to be ethically judgmental in character, i.e., it explicitly holds the higher stages as undeniably better than the lower ones, and tends to describe people in ethical terms--'chaotic/unprincipled' (Stage 1), or dogmatic (Stage 2), or principled (Stage 3)
Nevertheless, I see the veracity of such categories, albeit demanding much care and caution. Pigeonholing, specially in ethical terms, is dangerous business and can easily be misused and abused. However, I believe that Dr. Peck has realized the limitations of his theory and has provided caveats and exceptions in his later books, such as in "Further Along the Road Less Travelled"
Joyful, sorrowful, truthful.In fact, Dr. Peck says that we are _called_ to community. (For more on callings and vocations, read his book "A World Waiting to Be Born".) Using mystical _and_ scientific terms, myths _and_ true stories, he describes our need to recognize that we are all part of the Mystical Body of God (regardless of what we believe about God) and to put our understanding of this truth into practice. By describing four stages of human spirituality, he shows that we always have the potential to move higher and higher, closer and closer to God, but that we also always have the capacity to regress or backslide: on the one hand, we have wings; on the other hand, we are natural crawlers.
"The Different Drum" is a guide for creating and maintaining community, which Dr. Peck describes as a place where no one is attempting to heal or convert you, which makes it the best place for you to heal and convert yourself. This is possible because people are called to wholeness, to be the best that they can be; but healing and converting need to happen in community, for we are also called to recognize our limitations and cannot be whole without each other. These are just a few of the paradoxes in "The Different Drum", which is perhaps ten times as challenging than "The Road Less Traveled".
This book is both overflowing with joy and saturated with sorrow. The joy comes from the realization that, yes, community is possible; the sorrow comes from the acceptance of the fact that we must "die" to achieve community. The necessary act of emptying ourselves of our prejudices, our need to control, our need to convert, our theology, etc., is so much like death that Dr. Peck even discussed the stages people go through when they are faced with physical death--stages taken from Elisabeth Kubler-Ross' book "On Death and Dying".
I don't agree with everything Dr. Peck writes. For instance, I am a little leery over his stand on world government. Yet any criticisms of mine only remind me of my limitations and prove unarguably that I am called to wholeness through community with people with whom I disagree. I say that "The Different Drum" is both joyful and sorrowful because it is filled with truth.
Peck Mixes Spirituality with Common Sense

A good book
Essential Dog Book
An Informational Labrador Book

Ok! So You Like Illuminated Manuscripts.
A wealth of good stuff in a small packageThis book satisfies all these criteria. In fact, the only thing I dislike about this book is the fact that it's so small, it's really hard to keep open while I paint from it. REALLY hard, because if you get large and heavy enough items to hold both sides down, inevitably the items obscure parts of the page you are painting from!
Its size can be an advantage, though. I purchased this at the National Gallery in Washington, on a midday jaunt during a conference, then went back for the next conference presentation. When the speaker turned out to be droningly boring, I brought out this tiny book and paged through it inconspicuously under the table. Could I have done that with Janet Backhouse's monumental work? I think not...;)
The selections are wonderful, and they're usefully broken down into sections based on content--excellent when you need to find a quick animal or floral image for a border, a rendering of a king or queen, or a picture of a dragon or other supernatural being. Not so excellent when you need to find an example of, say, a late 1400's eastern French book of hours (there are many, just not in any kind of chronological or geographical order). But then, there are other resources that do that. This book is interesting for its variety, its excellent reproductions, and its well-selected and unusual miniatures.
An Exemplar for the keen-eyed!

Where was the editor?
Four Outstanding Women of the Gilded Age
Behind every great man there are great women!These women influenced their power, money, political and social status to unite and heal mankind. I should know, I was there........to carry on, and say every "Queen" to there own home..


Don't buy this deck!
Atmospheric & Nostalgic Art.Some readers may complain that this deck looks "ugly", but they should re-evaluate it in the right context. not only does the Morgan-Greer capture the epoch of the 70s era succinctly, but also, its color schemes conform to a carefully-thought-out, esoteric plan. It is a nicely-executed memoir of a bygone Golden Era.
The most beautiful tarot deck I've ever seenTruly one of a kind. Most tarot decks have blaise borders and pale colors. Not this one. Each picture is artfully done. On top of that the picture dominates the entire card, there is no border, so the card really stands out.
The only negative is the plain blue with white stars back. With such a beautiful face the backing is somewhat of a dissappointment.


Cash-in reissue of 1980s book: note subtle title changeFair enough; writers have to live. So here's Robin Morgan's 1989 book, reissued with a subtle title change and a few pages of post 9/11 stream-of-consciousness typing. But this book was already anachronistic in 1989. Most feminists had moved past the sloganeering of the 1970s, in which men and women were caricatured as (respectively) death-worshipping rapists with horrible yucky genitalia, and beautiful, loving, gentle, spiritual flower-beings. But Morgan's book was firmly a product of that mindset.
So Morgan will tell you that the cause of terrorism is simpler than you think. "_The terrorist is the logical incarnation of patriarchal politics in a technological world._ The terrorist is the son practicing what the father has practiced, and claiming to have found his own identity in doing so." [Italics in original.] "The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic."
So the cause of terrorism is those dreadful humans with bollocks. Morgan's prose is also not un-bollockular. Try: "He [heterosexual men] knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the brotherhood ritual of a sexual thrill in dominance. As a devotee of Thanatos, he is one with the practitioner of sado-masochistic 'play' between 'consenting adults,' as he is one with the rapist."
Some "devotees of Thanatos" and their partners and children may wonder what Thanatos is. It's Freud-speak for a supposed human death-drive, except that Morgan took Freud's fantasy a step further by declaring that "Thanatos" is exclusively male: Men are from Thanatos, women are from Eros.
Morgan's pop-Freudianism doesn't end there: sometimes a cigar is just a thrusting, phallic weapon. Morgan reveals: "The war toy, the rigid penetrating missiles, the dynamite and the blasting cap-these are at first only symbols of the message he must learn, fetishes of the ecstasy he is promised. But he must become them before he is rewarded with what the lack of ambivalence promises him: a frenzy, an excitement, an exhilaration-an orgasmic thrill in violent domination with which, he is taught, no act of lovemaking could possibly compete."
But this feels wrong, as well as tiredly shallow. Does a suicide bomber really feel sexual about the cylindrical objects he, or she, straps to her, or his, body? Other mental processes, involving religion, politics, hate, cycles of revenge, seem more relevant, more causative, than Morgan's pop-Freudian phallus fixation. Even in the 1980s, Morgan had to turn a blind eye to female terrorists like poster-girl Leila Khaled and others, whose actions were inconvenient facts Morgan dismissed as "tokens". And since Morgan counts military action by male heads of state as terrorism, she also had to turn a blind eye to the military activities of such bellicose political leaders as Meyer, Thatcher, and Indira Ghandi, whose wars were recent history when Morgan was writing. But the current terrorist wave has brought a feminisation of terrorism; increasing numbers of women suicide bombers make Morgan's focus on willies as the root of terrorism now seem quaint.
Morgan also claims that you can gauge a culture's potential for producing terrorists by assessing the status of women in that culture: the higher the status of women, the lower the potential for producing terrorist acts.
But Morgan rightly condemns US Government agencies for sponsoring wars, dictatorships, terrorists, the overthrow of democracies, and so on, particularly in the 1950s through to the 1990s. (I'm leaving Afghanistan and Iraq out of this picture, with ambivalence, though Morgan wouldn't.) But the status of women in the US is among the highest in the world. Ditto France: supporting genocide in Africa, "Rainbow-Warrior-Boum!", etc, plus childcare. While more patriarchal cultures like Thailand, Tonga, Switzerland, etc, produce somewhere between very little terrorism and none at all. Of course patriarchy is an evil; it's just not the _only_ evil in the world.
A more relevant distinction is between cultures that have universal, cheap, secular, education and those that don't. If you won't fund decent education, plenty of bad people will be glad to fill the gap, teaching hate and terrorism. There is certainly also a nexus between terrorism and the subjection of women, not only in relation to Islamism but strongly concentrated around Islamism. But Morgan's shallow book is useless as a discussion of that nexus.
There is one other problem with this book. Morgan writes about men with enormous and unrelenting disdain: she has said that she thinks hating men is proper, and (as a joke, though she expressly denied that she was joking) that perhaps heterosexual men could help the world by ceasing to exist. Me, I don't really like being hated, especially on doctrinaire grounds by someone who doesn't even know me. That's just my vested interest, of course. Still, I can't help thinking the world has enough hatred, and that Morgan's own contribution in that regard is perhaps more part of the problem than part of the solution.
Finally, there's the subtle title change. The book was originally published as _The Demon Lover: The Sexuality of Terrorism_. The new edition is called _The Demon Lover: The Roots of Terrorism_.
I can see why the original title had to go; in the English-speaking world, post 9/11, potential buyers might be irritated by Morgan's linkage of sexuality and terrorism, also the apparent implicit hint that terrorism is sexy. The new title makes the book sound more sensible, and for that reason it is a less accurate indication of the kind of book this is.
Cheers!
Laon
The Demon Lover
An incisive, important book

EASY READING
Easy To Understand!
excellent resource